When you flip through the Sears List of Subject Headings, you might expect to find an exhaustive vocabulary covering every topic imaginable. But the List works on a very different principle. It deliberately leaves out huge categories of headings, trusting catalogers to build them as needed. Understanding what is omitted, and why, is essential for anyone learning to assign subject headings in a small or medium library. This is not a flaw in the system. It is a design choice that keeps the List slim, flexible, and practical.
Table of Contents
- Why the Sears List leaves things out by design
- Categories of subject headings that are omitted
- Names of individual people, families, and organizations
- Geographic names and places
- Uniform titles and named works
- Specific instances within broad categories
- How to coin a missing subject heading
- Start from the broader category
- Follow the pattern and respect common usage
- Use the Key Headings as templates
- Record everything in a local authority file
- Adapting the Sears List for regional and cultural relevance
- Building headings for local subjects
- Adjusting vocabulary and spelling
- Handling sensitive and changing terminology
- Why the omissions make Sears stronger
Why the Sears List leaves things out by design
The Sears List was never meant to be a complete authority file. It was created for small libraries, including school libraries, public libraries, and church libraries, where a simpler vocabulary makes more sense than the sprawling Library of Congress Subject Headings, which now fills several large printed volumes. Instead of listing every possible term, Sears provides a foundation of the most commonly needed headings plus a pattern for creating new ones.
This is the key idea. The List is described in its own principles section as a skeleton or pattern for creating headings as needed, not a finished vocabulary. A cataloger using Sears is expected to take an active part in building a larger local vocabulary. Many more headings can be coined from the List than are actually printed in it.
The practical benefit is obvious. A small library does not need a heading for every rare disease, every river, or every author who ever lived. Carrying that weight would make the List expensive, unwieldy, and largely irrelevant to a small collection. By omitting these categories, Sears stays affordable and easy to use while still allowing each library to expand its catalog to fit its own holdings.
Categories of subject headings that are omitted
The omissions fall into a few clear groups. Once you recognize the pattern, you can predict what will and will not appear in the List.
Names of individual people, families, and organizations
Sears does not attempt to list personal names or corporate names. There are simply too many to fit in a single volume, and most are irrelevant to any given library. So you will not find headings for individual persons such as authors, leaders, or scientists, nor for families. Corporate bodies are also left out. This includes associations, societies, government bodies, religious denominations, business firms, performing groups, colleges, libraries, hospitals, and similar entities.
When a library has material about a specific person or organization, the cataloger establishes the name heading using standard rules. For example, a heading for a former US president would be created in inverted form with dates if needed, such as Clinton, Bill, 1946-. The List offers a couple of illustrative examples, like Jesus Christ and Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616, mainly to show how subdivisions work under voluminous subjects, not to provide name coverage.
Geographic names and places
Place names are also omitted as a category. Geographic headings are far too numerous for one volume, ranging from continents down to individual ponds. The few that appear in Sears, such as United States, Ohio, and Chicago (Ill.), are there only as examples to demonstrate the correct form. They are not meant to be a usable geographic list.
This omission covers political jurisdictions like countries, states, and cities; groups of countries and alliances; and natural features such as mountain ranges, individual mountains, islands, rivers, river valleys, oceans, and lakes. The cataloger establishes these as needed using standard reference sources like a current world gazetteer or atlas.
Uniform titles and named works
The third major group of omitted names is uniform titles. These are the established names of anonymous literary works, newspapers, periodicals, sacred scriptures, motion pictures, and radio and television programs. Material about a particular film or anonymous work is entered directly under the uniform title, such as a heading in the form of a film title qualified by (Motion picture). Since these titles are endless, they too are coined by the cataloger.
Specific instances within broad categories
Beyond names, Sears omits the specific members of many large categories while keeping the broad term. The general references in the List point to this. Under Flowers, for instance, the reference instructs the cataloger to add types of flowers such as Roses as needed. The same logic applies across the board, covering specific foods, tools, sports, musical instruments, fruits, birds, fishes, chemicals, minerals, industries, diseases, organs of the body, languages, national literatures, ethnic groups, wars, battles, and treaties. Sears lists the category and leaves the specific instances to you.
How to coin a missing subject heading
Since so much is left out, knowing how to create a heading correctly is the heart of working with Sears. The process follows the principle of specific and direct entry, first formulated by Charles Ammi Cutter. A work is entered under the most specific heading that matches its content, neither broader nor narrower.
Start from the broader category
Suppose you are cataloging a book on penguins and the heading Penguins is not in the List. The principle of specific entry says you must not simply file it under Birds. Instead, you consult the broader category. At Birds you find a general reference inviting you to add types of birds as needed. You then establish Penguins as a narrower term under Birds and assign it to the book. A reader searching for penguins should not come up empty just because the term was not pre-printed.
Follow the pattern and respect common usage
When coining a heading, choose the term that matches literary warrant, meaning the language most often used in the literature itself. The heading should reflect common usage and be clear and unambiguous. Where one word carries two meanings, it must be qualified, as Sears does with Depression (Psychology) versus the economic sense. The List’s existing entries serve as a model for form, so a newly coined heading looks consistent with the printed ones.
Use the Key Headings as templates
For subdivisions, Sears provides Key Headings that act as model patterns. The subdivisions listed under a sample city can be applied to any city, those under a sample state to any state, and those under a sample country to any country. This lets a cataloger handle a place or topic the List never explicitly mentioned, simply by copying the established pattern.
Record everything in a local authority file
Every coined heading must be entered into the library’s own authority file along with its cross references. Without this record there is no consistency. If you create a heading and its references today, you need to know exactly what you did when a related heading comes up next month. The List itself cannot tell you, because the term was your own addition.
Adapting the Sears List for regional and cultural relevance
The omissions become especially important once you consider that Sears was built around American and Western assumptions. It uses American spelling, preferring Labor over Labour and catalog over catalogue, and many of its examples reflect a Western, largely Christian cultural frame. For libraries outside that context, the open structure of the List is what makes it usable at all.
Building headings for local subjects
Because specific names of people, places, and organizations are omitted, a library is free, and indeed expected, to supply terms that matter to its own users. A library here can establish headings for regional rivers, local festivals, indigenous languages, regional authors, and homegrown institutions without waiting for them to appear in a future edition. The framework treats these additions as normal cataloging work, not as exceptions.
Adjusting vocabulary and spelling
The List openly acknowledges that common usage depends on who the users are, and that the popular local term is often preferable to a technical or foreign one. A library can therefore adapt spelling conventions and choose terms that its readers actually use, while keeping cross references from the variant forms. Specialized adaptations of Sears have been produced for other contexts, such as the Canadian companion and a Spanish-language edition, which shows that regional tailoring is part of how the List is meant to live and grow.
Handling sensitive and changing terminology
Language does not stand still, and neither should subject headings. Sears has revised outdated terms over the years, replacing terms that fell out of acceptable usage. Because headings are added and revised locally, a cataloger can apply current, respectful, and culturally appropriate terminology for communities and topics the original List never covered, while keeping older terms as cross references where they still help users find material. This adaptability is exactly why a List that omits so much can still serve libraries with very different collections and readerships.
Why the omissions make Sears stronger
It might seem strange that a tool defined partly by what it leaves out has remained useful for a century. But the omissions are the source of its strength. A short, affordable List with a clear pattern is far more practical for a small library than an enormous vocabulary that is mostly irrelevant. By learning the categories that are left out and the rules for filling the gaps, a cataloger turns the Sears List from a fixed vocabulary into a living, locally tailored authority. The List supplies the grammar; the cataloger supplies the words.
What do you think? If you were setting up the catalog for a small community library, which local subjects would you most need to coin headings for that the Sears List does not already provide? And do you think an open, build-as-you-go vocabulary serves users better than a fully comprehensive one that tries to anticipate every term?
References
- https://www.loc.gov/aba/publications/FreeLCSH/freelcsh.html
- https://searslistofsubjectheadings.com/page/principles
- https://searslistofsubjectheadings.com/page/added
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Ammi_Cutter
- https://www.niso.org/publications/z3919-2005-r2010
- https://searslistofsubjectheadings.com/page/key

Leave a Reply